Best Phones Under $800

RedMagic 11 Air
Apple iPhone 17
Nothing Phone (3)
OnePlus 15R
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro

RedMagic

Apple

Nothing

OnePlus

Nothing

11 Air

iPhone 17

Phone (3)

15R

Phone (4a) Pro

Ranked #16 of 44

Ranked #18 of 44

Ranked #25 of 44

Ranked #17 of 44

Ranked #32 of 44

578/ 727
568/ 727
535/ 727
573/ 727
482/ 727

Overall

Overall

Overall

Overall

Overall

Price
$529
$799
$799
$699.99
$499
Display
550/ 845
582/ 845
525/ 845
663/ 845
579/ 845
Performance
820/ 948
781/ 948
544/ 948
693/ 948
306/ 948
Camera
435/ 606
429/ 606
572/ 606
403/ 606
544/ 606
Battery
707/ 799
555/ 799
593/ 799
655/ 799
572/ 799
Charging
243/ 700
332/ 700
268/ 700
356/ 700
246/ 700
Speaker
538/ 857
762/ 857
652/ 857
533/ 857
612/ 857
Biometrics
402/ 945
207/ 945
504/ 945
663/ 945
367/ 945
Microphone
520/ 949
664/ 949
437/ 949
497/ 949
455/ 949
Data Transfer
104/ 877
103/ 877
102/ 877
120/ 877
92/ 877
By Christian de LooperPublished April 29, 2026

Phones priced under $800 cover a wide range of priorities, from gaming performance and camera quality to display technology and overall value. The devices in this list are ranked on benchmarks, battery life, display specs, camera systems, and software support, giving a clear picture of where each phone excels and where it compromises.

The RedMagic 11 Air takes the top spot as the best overall option, pairing flagship-tier processing power with a remarkably light build that sets it apart physically from heavier competitors. For those who prefer iOS, the Apple iPhone 17 delivers a strong balance of performance and long-term software support. The Nothing Phone (3) stands out for camera performance, while the OnePlus 15R earns its place with one of the best displays available at this price.

Whether you need a capable all-rounder or want to optimize for a specific feature like photography or screen quality, the picks here reflect measurable strengths across the sub-$800 segment. A budget-conscious option from Nothing also appears for those looking to spend well under $500 without sacrificing too much.

Best Overall Under $800

Score Overview

Display550/ 845
Performance820/ 948
Camera435/ 606
Battery707/ 799
Charging243/ 700
Speaker538/ 857
Biometrics402/ 945
Microphone520/ 949
Data Transfer104/ 877

For those who simply want the best they can get under $800, the RedMagic 11 Air is the way to go. Part of its appeal is its battery. The RedMagic 11 Air loses only 37% charge during an hour of gaming, a drain rate that puts it among the top three in our database and well ahead of most phones in this price range. Paired with a Snapdragon 8 Elite and 16GB of RAM, it also posts multi-core scores competitive with phones costing several hundred dollars more.

The speaker is near the bottom of our database — noticeably quiet at 79.2 dBA maximum and compressed-sounding at higher volumes. The camera underperforms for the price too, and while main sensor sharpness is roughly comparable to the iPhone 17 in good light, dynamic range is narrower and color accuracy trails the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro by a meaningful margin. The display peaks at 1,896 nits in HDR, which is functional but below average for this tier. Charging reaches 52% in 30 minutes at 80W — solid in absolute terms, but the (4a) Pro hits 63% in the same window on a slower charger.

If battery endurance and raw processing throughput are the priority, this phone delivers both at a price point where neither usually comes together.

Best iPhone Under $800

Score Overview

Display582/ 845
Performance781/ 948
Camera429/ 606
Battery555/ 799
Charging332/ 700
Speaker762/ 857
Biometrics207/ 945
Microphone664/ 949
Data Transfer103/ 877

The A19 chip in the iPhone 17 puts up a GeekBench multi-core score of 9,645 — close to the 10,158 the Pro achieves, and well ahead of the Nothing Phone (3)'s 6,992. That means everyday performance and sustained workloads feel effectively the same as the more expensive sibling. Speaker output is also comparable to the Pro, and the display hits 3,022 nits peak HDR brightness, which is competitive with the best screens at this price.

The downsides are that battery life sits in the middle of our tested pool: web browsing drained 22% over five hours and gaming drained 27%, which points to roughly a day of typical use rather than two. The iPhone 17 Pro drains only 17 percent per hour during web use. Camera performance is a weakness too — main camera detail in good light is modest, and the phone lacks a telephoto lens. The Nothing Phone (3) produces noticeably sharper images and handles a wider dynamic range in mixed lighting.

What the iPhone 17 offers is the iOS ecosystem, strong sustained processor performance, and a compact 6.3-inch form factor.

Best Camera Phone Under $800

Score Overview

Display525/ 845
Performance544/ 948
Camera572/ 606
Battery593/ 799
Charging268/ 700
Speaker652/ 857
Biometrics504/ 945
Microphone437/ 949
Data Transfer102/ 877

At $799, the Nothing Phone (3) puts up the strongest camera results we've measured in this price tier, with main, front, and telephoto lenses all delivering high sharpness across lighting conditions. The front camera is a particular standout — it resolves significantly more detail than the Xiaomi 15T Pro's front lens at the same price, which lags well behind in bright-light sharpness. Color accuracy on the main lens sits closer to reference than the 15T Pro, which carries roughly 60% more color error in bright conditions. Dynamic range on the main lens is also wider, meaning the Phone (3) holds detail in highlights and shadows that the Xiaomi clips.

Video stabilization is the clearest weakness. The 15T Pro is among the best-stabilized phones we've tested at any price, and the Nothing Phone (3) doesn't come close — handheld video shows more movement, particularly noticeable when walking. If video is the priority, that gap matters.

Best Display Under $800

Score Overview

Display663/ 845
Performance693/ 948
Camera403/ 606
Battery655/ 799
Charging356/ 700
Speaker533/ 857
Biometrics663/ 945
Microphone497/ 949
Data Transfer120/ 877

Peak HDR brightness on the 15R reaches 3,158 nits — more than two and a half times what the Xiaomi 15T Pro delivers at the same price point, and a meaningful step up from the OnePlus 15's 1,958 nits despite that phone costing $200 more. In practical terms, HDR content on a bright screen or outdoors holds its brightness and contrast in a way that most sub-$800 panels don't. Color accuracy in its calibrated mode is tight enough that most users won't notice any cast or drift from neutral. Manual brightness lands just under 790 nits, which is adequate for indoor use but not the highest in this price range.

The display does have a real limitation. HDR brightness stability is inconsistent, dropping noticeably during sustained HDR playback compared to rivals like the Xiaomi 15T Pro, which holds nearly full brightness throughout. Touch latency is also higher than average — perceptible if you're coming from a more responsive panel. The Honor Magic7 Pro, the highest-ranked display phone in our database, has roughly half the color error of the 15R and significantly better HDR stability, which is the gap $600 buys you.

For buyers under $800, the 15R's peak brightness and color accuracy combination isn't matched by anything else at this price.

Best Value Under $500

Score Overview

Display579/ 845
Performance306/ 948
Camera544/ 606
Battery572/ 799
Charging246/ 700
Speaker612/ 857
Biometrics367/ 945
Microphone455/ 949
Data Transfer92/ 877

At $499, the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro's main camera resolves noticeably more detail in daylight than either the Pixel 10a or the standard Nothing Phone (4a) at the same or lower price — the sharpness gap over the 4a is substantial. That puts it among the stronger cameras in its price range, which is a real differentiator at this tier where most $499 phones are trading off image quality for other features.

The 5,080mAh battery delivers around 26 hours of video playback, and gaming drain is moderate. That's solid for a mid-range device, though not class-leading — the Pixel 10a sits slightly ahead on overall battery score despite a comparable cell size.

Color accuracy from the main camera is acceptable but not precise. Skin tones show a meaningful deviation from reference — roughly comparable to the RedMagic 11 Air, and noticeably less accurate than the Pixel 10a's main sensor. The 144Hz AMOLED panel is bright enough for outdoor use at 1,755 nits peak HDR. Performance is mid-tier: fine for everyday use, but the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 leaves a clear gap versus flagship chips.

Connectivity and microphone performance are weak spots worth knowing about. Biometrics are slow relative to most phones at this price. The 50W wired charging reaches a full charge in a reasonable time, but there's no wireless charging option.

Related